[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2027
BMO Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Conference: June 20–25, 2027
Exhibition: June 21–24, 2027
Menu
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
    • The Role of the Corresponding Author
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Event Site
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • Student Poster Competition: On-Demand Session
  • Brayton Cycle Compare & Solve: A New Tool for Analysis and Comparison of Brayton Cycle Engines

Brayton Cycle Compare & Solve: A New Tool for Analysis and Comparison of Brayton Cycle Engines

The air-breathing Brayton cycle is widespread throughout power generation and propulsion systems, making it a fundamental part of every mechanical or aerospace engineering student’s repertoire. Students are introduced to cycle analysis in thermodynamics courses and may see more in-depth coverage of the cycle for gas turbine applications in advanced technical elective courses. When pushing students from analyzing to designing an engine, they need to immediately see the effects of any change they make. In addition, students need to be able to compare their engine designs and make sense of the effects their changes have on the overall engine performance. The solution to enable this kind of design work in a course is a lightweight cycle simulator tool capable of quickly and accurately analyzing Brayton cycle engines.  For the tool to be useful in a classroom, it needs to be intuitive, easy to use, and quick to set up, so no time is wasted learning the software. Users with an introductory background of the non-ideal Brayton cycle should be able to open the program and immediately start analyzing the cycle of a relevant engine. 

These requirements are met in the creation of a gas turbine engine simulator, Brayton Cycle: Compare & Solve (BCCS). In a Matlab graphical user interface, that can be hosted on a web page, the user specifies numerous engine parameters such as: component efficiencies, stage pressure ratios, flight speeds, engine layouts, etc. Next, the tool performs complete thermodynamic design point analysis of the engine. From here, the user can generate temperature-entropy and pressure-volume diagrams, view the fluid properties at each station, and view engine performance parameters such as net thrust or thrust specific fuel consumption. Most importantly, the solver records the results so multiple engines can be solved and compared simultaneously. Users can make small changes to an engine and instantly see how their changes affect the engine temperatures, pressures, and performance. Being able to analyze and compare engines quickly enables the introduction of more design-based problems.

This poster presents two topics First, is the operation of BCCS and the analysis process it uses. This will include an explanation of some of the programs key features. Second, is how BCCS can be leveraged to enhance design-based learning, specifically in an existing aerospace engineering propulsion course at The Ohio State University including lecture methods, assessments, and student feedback.

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Brayton Cycle Compare & Solve: A New Tool for Analysis and Comparison of Brayton Cycle Engines

Category

Student Poster Presentation

Description

Session: Student Poster Competition: On-Demand Session

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-15996

Start Time: , 

Presenting Author: Louis Christensen

Authors: Louis Christensen The Ohio State University
Randall Mathison The Ohio State University
 
 

 














 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected