[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2027
BMO Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Conference: June 20–25, 2027
Exhibition: June 21–24, 2027
Menu
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
    • The Role of the Corresponding Author
  • Event Site
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • 26-03 Mistuning II
  • Vibration Analyses of an Axial Turbine Wheel With Intentional Mistuning

Vibration Analyses of an Axial Turbine Wheel With Intentional Mistuning

The last stage bladed disk of a steam turbine is analyzed with respect to both flutter susceptibility and limitation of forced response. Due to the lack of variable stator vanes unfavorable flow conditions may occur which can lead to flow separation in some circumstances. Consequently, there is the risk of flutter in principle, particularly at nominal speed under part load conditions. For this reason, intentional mistuning is employed by the manufacturer with the objective to prevent any self-excited vibrations. A first step in this direction is done by choosing alternate mistuning, which keeps the manufactural efforts in limits since only two different blade designs are allowed. In this sense, two different series of blades have been made. However, it is well known that small deviations from the design intention are unavoidable due to the manufacturing procedure, which could be proved by bonk tests carried out earlier. The influence of these additional but unwanted deviations is considered in numerical simulations. Moreover, the strong dependence of blade frequencies on the speed is taken into account since it significantly attenuates the blade to blade frequency difference in this particular case.

Within an academic study the turbine wheel is modelled as blade integrated disk in order to demonstrate fundamental effects of intentional mistuning on flutter susceptibility and forced response. For that purpose, reduced order models are built up by using the subset of nominal system mode approach introduced by Yang and Griffin [1], which conveniently allows for taking into account both differing mistuning patterns and the impact of aeroelastic interaction. Focusing on the first flap mode it could be shown that a mitigation of flutter susceptibility is achieved by prescribing alternate mistuning, which indeed affects an increase of originally small aerodynamic damping ratios. Nevertheless, the occurrence of negative damping ratios could not be completely precluded at part load conditions. That is why optimization studies are conducted based on genetic algorithms with the objective function of maximizing the lowest aerodynamic damping ratios. Again only two different blade designs are admitted. Finally, mistuning patterns could be identified causing a tremendous increase of aerodynamic damping ratios. The robustness of the solutions found could be proved by superimposing additional random mistuning. Another study is focused on the impact of mistuning strength.

Further analyses are addressing the forced response at part speed conditions, where different resonance crossings are becoming apparent in the Campbell plot. An increase of the forced response compared to the tuned counterpart is partly unpreventable because of unfavorable aerodynamic damping curves. Independently, the maximum forced response has to be limited also in case of applying large intentional mistuning.

[1] Yang, M. T., Griffin, J. H., „A Reduced-Order model of Mistuning Using a Subset of Nominal System Modes“. J Eng Gas Turb Power, 123, pp. 893-900 (2001).

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Vibration Analyses of an Axial Turbine Wheel With Intentional Mistuning

Category

Technical Paper Publication

Description

Session: 26-03 Mistuning II

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-14468

Start Time: September 21, 2020, 12:45 PM

Presenting Author: Bernd Beirow

Authors: Bernd Beirow Brandenburg University of Technology
Arnold Kuehhorn Brandenburg University of Technology
Robby Weber Brandenburg University of Technology
Frederik Popig Siemens AG

 














 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected