[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2026
Allianz MiCo
Milan, Italy

Conference: June 15–19, 2026
Exhibition: June 16–18, 2026
Menu
  • Technical Program
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
  • Event Site
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • 31-11 Aerodynamic Analyses & Improvements
  • Methods to Have Tighter Clearance in Gas Turbine: Turbine Section

Methods to Have Tighter Clearance in Gas Turbine: Turbine Section

Typically Gas turbine clearance between stator and rotor parts are governed by radial clearance which determines the performance, cooling flow requirements, part performance etc. These clearances have to be optimized to meet the product requirements. Too tight the clearance at assembly condition causes excessive rubbing during starting or shutdown of the gas turbine which could cause excessive heat generation and damage the rotating and statoric parts. In some case, rubbing can cause tip liberations and damages to the flow path causing aero dynamic losses. Similarly, if rotor tip clearance is large at assembly condition causes aerodynamic losses. Tip clearance should be kept as minimum as possible to have proper balance between Tip rubs at low speed and aero dynamic loss. In this paper describes the experience of Baker Hughes, wherein different design options to have optimized clearance in Low pressure turbine section of Gas turbine is discussed. Typically in Low pressure turbine wherein the turbine airfoils are provided with tip rails and shrouds are brazed with honeycombs. These are allowed to rub during the startup of Gas turbine engine and provide a tighter clearance at Steady state operating condition. In this paper, to have tighter clearance in operating condition few methods of incorporating axial clearance in addition to radial tip clearance is discussed. By incorporating tighter axial clearance, it is found to be evident that performance estimated has improved compared to having only radial tip clearance. This paper also describes how the honeycomb design has to be for axial clearance control and the methods for rubbing the tip shroud with honeycomb. This paper highlights the worm chart developed for a rotor blade and stator shroud configuration and highlight the benefit of axial clearance control mechanism. This paper also covers the different designs of heat dissipation methods in the tip rails of a bucket while it is rubbing with honeycomb. In this paper, analytical case study was shown that, when axial clearance is made tighter, it reduces the leakage flows and improves Low pressure turbine stage efficiency significantly

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Methods to Have Tighter Clearance in Gas Turbine: Turbine Section

Category

Technical Paper Publication

Description

Session: 31-11 Aerodynamic Analyses & Improvements

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-15973

Start Time: September 25, 2020, 12:45 PM

Presenting Author: Kammalapalli Ramesh

Authors: Babu Santhana Gopalakrishnan Baker Hughes
Ramesh Kammalapalli Baker Hughes
Leonardo Tognarelli Baker Hughes
 

 














 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected