[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2026
Allianz MiCo
Milan, Italy

Conference: June 15–19, 2026
Exhibition: June 16–18, 2026
Menu
  • Technical Program
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
  • Event Site
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • 31-11 Aerodynamic Analyses & Improvements
  • Effects of Trailing Edge Thickness and Blade Loading Distribution on the Aerodynamic Performance of Simulated CMC Turbine Blades

Effects of Trailing Edge Thickness and Blade Loading Distribution on the Aerodynamic Performance of Simulated CMC Turbine Blades

Aerodynamic loss levels were measured experimentally for three simulated Ceramic Matrix Composite (CMC) blade sets in a large-scale transonic turbine blade cascade.  Due to potential manufacturing restrictions, the trailing edge thicknesses of CMC blades are anticipated to be significantly larger than those of current metallic blades.  The blades tested in the current study had trailing edge thicknesses of 5%, 7%, and 9% relative to the blade axial chord.  The blades were designed with uniform throat dimensions for all the three blade sets, so the blade loading distributions were varied to retain similar overall loading levels.  The 9% blade was significantly front-loaded, with loading distributions shifting aft for the lower trailing edge thicknesses.  Data were acquired at four Reynolds numbers, covering a factor of six variation.  All data were acquired nominally at the design isentropic exit Mach number of 0.74.  Measurements include blade loading and five-hole probe surveys at two downstream stations.  The effects of inlet turbulence intensity were also examined.  Total pressure loss data were integrated to determine overall loss levels for each of the three measured blade passages.  Excellent periodicity was noted for all passages.  For low inlet turbulence levels, losses were surprisingly lower for the thickest trailing edge at low Reynolds numbers, but were highest at the highest Reynolds number. In general, losses were found to scale well with Reynolds number, although front loading was found to significantly reduce the loss sensitivity to Reynolds number.  For high inlet turbulence intensity, losses were found to scale with trailing edge thickness as expected, and Reynolds number sensitivity was reduced for all three blade sets.  Loss levels at the highest Reynolds number were comparable at low and high inlet turbulence intensity levels.

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Effects of Trailing Edge Thickness and Blade Loading Distribution on the Aerodynamic Performance of Simulated CMC Turbine Blades

Category

Technical Paper Publication

Description

Session: 31-11 Aerodynamic Analyses & Improvements

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-15802

Start Time: September 25, 2020, 12:45 PM

Presenting Author: Paul W. Giel

Authors: Paul Giel VPL at NASA Glenn
Vikram Shyam NASA Glenn Research Center
Paht Juangphanich NASA Glenn Research Center
John Clark AFRL

 














 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected