[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2026
Allianz MiCo
Milan, Italy

Conference: June 15–19, 2026
Exhibition: June 16–18, 2026
Menu
  • Technical Program
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
  • Event Site
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • 30-22 Transonic Compressors - 2
  • Large Eddy Simulation of Laminar and Turbulent Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions in a Transonic Passage

Large Eddy Simulation of Laminar and Turbulent Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions in a Transonic Passage

Shock/boundary layer interactions (SBLI) are a fundamental fluid mechanics problem, which is relevant in a wide range of applications including transonic rotors in turbomachinery.  This paper uses wall-resolved large eddy simulation (LES) to examine the interaction of transonic flow over a curved surface with laminar and turbulent boundary layers.   The LES calculations were performed using GENESIS, which is based on HpMusic and is a variable order (up to sixth) unstructured grid solver employing a discontinuous formulation known as flux reconstruction (FR) / correction procedure via reconstruction (CPR) (Huynh, 2007). The solution is advanced in time using a pre-conditioned implicit algorithm to allow for larger time steps and hence for more efficient computation of practically-relevant, high-Reynolds number flows. The geometry created for this analytical study is a transonic passage with a convergent-divergent nozzle that expands the flow to the desired Mach number upstream of the shock and then introduces constant radius curvature near the location of a normal shock to simulate local airfoil camber. The Mach numbers in the divergent section of the transonic passage simulate single stage commercial fan blades.  This configuration was designed to be the simplest test case that is able to demonstrate relevant SBLI physics using wall-resolved LES, which avoids the uncertainty related to boundary and flow conditions in available high Reynolds number experimental data.

The results predicted with the LES calculations show significant differences between laminar and turbulent SBLI in terms of shock structure, boundary layer separation and transition, and aerodynamic losses.   When the inflow boundary layer is laminar, an unsteady separation forms significantly upstream of the main normal shock leading to the formation of a first upstream oblique wave.  The flow then transitions to turbulence causing a second set of oblique waves to form a ‘lambda foot’ with the main normal shock.   However, when the boundary layer is tripped turbulent near the throat of the transonic passage a fundamentally different flow structure is observed: the first oblique wave that was due to laminar separation is absent and a single, spatially more confined ‘lambda foot’ is formed.   These changes in the shock structure and the associated changes in the location and extent of flow separation lead to a lower wake deficit for the turbulent case.  The results of the LES calculations presented here capture the laminar and turbulent SBLI physics consistent with the classical visualizations obtained by Liepmann (1946) of transonic flow over a biconvex airfoil as well as recent measurements reported by Hergt et al. (2018) in a transonic compressor cascade.

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Large Eddy Simulation of Laminar and Turbulent Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions in a Transonic Passage

Category

Technical Paper Publication

Description

Session: 30-22 Transonic Compressors - 2

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-14244

Start Time: September 22, 2020, 12:45 PM

Presenting Author: Stephan Priebe

Authors: Stephan Priebe GE Research
Daniel Wilkin GE Aviation
Andy Breeze-Stringfellow GE Aviation
Giridhar Jothiprasad GE Research
Lawrence CheungGE Research
 














 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected