[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
Turbo Expo 2027
BMO Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Conference: June 20–25, 2027
Exhibition: June 21–24, 2027
Menu
  • Tracks and Organizers
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Conflict in Ukraine
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
    • The Role of the Corresponding Author
  • Help/Resources
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Contact Us
    • Organizer Resources
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • Turbo Expo Paper Quality Standards
      • ASME Turbo Expo Journal Best Paper Guidelines
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • ​​​​​​​Appeal Process for the Journal of Turbomachinery
      • The Appeal Process for the ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jerzy T. Sawicki, Ph.D., P.E., Editor
      • Indexing
      • Tutorial Handout Template
      • Poster Session Guidelines
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
  • Event Site
  • Publication Schedule
  • Home
  • Home
  • ASME 2020 Turbo Expo - Virtual Conference Session Gallery
  • 37-08 Unsteady Flows in Turbines 2
  • Unsteady Effects due to Rotor Purge Flow Variations in a Dual-Spool Turbine Setup

Unsteady Effects due to Rotor Purge Flow Variations in a Dual-Spool Turbine Setup

The paper discusses the impact of rotor purge flows on the unsteady flow field downstream of a two-stage, two-spool test turbine. The analyzed setup is representative of the second high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the first low-pressure turbine (LPT) stage in a modern turbofan aero-engine, with a turbine center frame (TCF) with non-turning struts in-between the two turbines. All measurements were carried out for an engine-representative test vehicle setup at the Transonic Test Turbine Facility at Graz University of Technology. The test rig features a secondary air system delivering five purge flows with independent temperature and mass flow control to the HPT and LPT cavities.

This work extends the results shown in two recent publications analyzing the time-resolved flow through the same two-stage setup at fixed purge flow rates. The paper aims to provide additional input about the driving sources of unsteadiness in gas turbines for aeronautic applications, by isolating the HPT and LPT purge air contributions. 

The time-resolved flow field at the LPT exit was acquired with a Fast Response Aerodynamic Pressure Probe (FRAPP) for three different purge conditions (reference case, no HPT purge case, no LPT purge case), to separate and quantify the impact of HPT and LPT purge contributions on the main flow field. The so-called Rotor Synchronic Averaging (RSA) technique was used as phase-averaging approach, to account for the unsteadiness due to both rotors. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) was then applied to isolate the most important structures and identify their origins. The comparison of the three data-sets shows a significant influence of the HPT purge on the entire flow field at the LPT exit, even though the HPT is located far upstream, while the LPT purge impact appears to mostly affect the end-wall region.

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

 

Unsteady Effects due to Rotor Purge Flow Variations in a Dual-Spool Turbine Setup

Category

Technical Paper Publication

Description

Session: 37-08 Unsteady Flows in Turbines 2

ASME Paper Number: GT2020-15216

Start Time: September 25, 2020, 10:15 AM

Presenting Author: Filippo Merli

Authors: Filippo Merli Graz University of Technology
Patrick Zeno Sterzinger Graz University of Technology
Matteo Dellacasagrande Università di Genova
Lukas Wiesinger Graz University of Technology
Andreas PetersGE Aviation
Franz Heitmeir Graz University of Technology
Emil Göttlich Graz University of Technology













 

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft no longer supports IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected